Thursday, July 15, 2010

Gee's Bend quilts: first impression & second thoughts

This article continues the everlasting discussion--or debate--between art and craft, and what makes something art.  As much as Kalina refers to the quilts as "remarkably powerful" and "compelling visual statements" that "declare themselves viscerally," I can't help but think about the intention of the quilters during the sewing process.  It is detailed how much quilting was not a hobby.  It was a necessary task, a chore like feeding hogs.  Prissy Pettiway admits she was "too tired to do no sewing," but did it because to stay warm in her old, drafty house.  
With specific venues such as folk art museums and craft museums, what is the likelihood that exhibits like this will occur in the future?  I wonder how one of the Pettiway ladies would react if they visited the Whitney and toured the exhibition.  Would they appreciate the privilege of showing in such a distinguished, iconic American art museum?  I imagine the quilters (or, ahem, artists) standing around at their opening reception, daintily balancing plates of crudites, sipping  chardonnay.  Ladies discussing their influences of "Paul Klee architectural fantasy" and how they decided to use work clothes for an "extremely subtle interplay of hue and value."
But perhaps I am too quick to harshly judge.  Upon searching for color images of the quilts, I found that Sports Illustrated cover girl turned home furnishings guru Kathy Ireland has designed (and I use that word loosely) a series of Gee's Bend home accessories, ranging from lamps, to rugs, etc.  Her company states that they appropriately compensate the quilters.  Also, many quilters have gained gallery representation from the success of the touring museum show.

4 comments:

  1. I was thinking the same thing. If the Gee Bend ladies saw their work hanging in the museum (which I assume they must have seen them) what would they have said. I believe they would have stood proudly by their work. After all they did hang their quilts on the wash line to show off their designs.

    The next question is the compensation the women received. Were they appropriately paid and did this payment breakdown the aesthetic they created. With money they could afford to connect to the world in ways unobtainable before. What made the ladies unique was their separation to the art world. By connecting to that world, even to see their work hung in a gallery, would not that destroy their special lack of connection they had. Any new work could now be said to be inspired by any modernist painter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kathy Freakin' Ireland? I had to follow it up, and there it is:
    http://www.addarug.com/ProductItem.cfm?Category=323&parentID=318
    If you're interested in doing a little digging on the money involved, please look into a company called Tinwood Media...you might be interested in whose interests are at stake here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. On a side note, this blog entry is like David Foster Wallace's style of writing.

    On another note, just in case anyone was wondering, Kathy Ireland's 1989 25th anniversary Sports Illustrated magazine cover, is supposedly the best selling issue of all time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Deep research serves our seminar agenda...

    ReplyDelete