More questions than assertions - or questions as assertions; - or questionable assertions.

How does the depth of contemporary art knowledge affect our perceptions of art?
Is there a tipping point where, as an audience, we demand a certain level of sophistication and reflexiveness based on the knowledge of the artist (outsider artist vs. MFA artist)?
Are we constantly searching for the fictional lost innocence of making?
Are these disinterested objects?
Is this any relationship between the Primitivism show, the Kalina article and writing a thesis paper?
(i.e. questions regarding the contextualization of objects a priori versus a posteriori)